Sunday, September 20, 2015

Internet Is Not The Problem


You guys have probably started writing your blogs or doing your homework, and somehow through searches and searches, have come to reading this blog. Or, you may be searching for your research topics in one tab, and chatting with your facebook friends in another. Whether or not this multitasking is intentional, we could all say in one voice that distractions through the Internet are inevitable.

For example, I know that I have to finish writing this blog within the next few hours, but I have this impulse to watch a new episode of a drama that just came out today. I cannot finish this homework unless I satisfy my urge, and thus start watching my favorite drama. But after about 20 minutes into it, I start to panic a little after realizing how much more I have to write. I then go back to my blog, write three more sentences, and go back to my enjoyment again.  According to Gary Small and Gigi Vorgan’s “Meet Your iBrain: How Technology Changes the Way We Think,” this continuous partial attention will sooner or later build up stress in our brains and eventually destroy our “ego and sense of self-worth.” This also means that the ability of our hippocampus, which “allows us to learn and remember new information,” subsides (Small and Vorgan 147). It is thought that the Internet and all the other digital devices is the cause for this problem.

But is the digital age that we live in really the problem? Is Internet really doing us wrong than doing us good? If you think about all the benefits that the Internet provides us, like enabling us to digitally connect and communicate with one another and to google map uncertain destinations, the advantages of the Internet outdo the disadvantages of the Internet. As shown in Friedman’s “Come the Revolution,” students are now able to earn a degree through online courses offered by professors from some of the top universities in America for not even one percent of the normal tuition money that we pay while physically attending college. Although we may be using our laptops in class to watch YouTube videos or update our Facebook profiles, there are still many people out there who are actually willing to learn and work. Snyder states in his essay that the Internet might be “distracting America’s future workforce” from making our economy any more prosperous, but this cannot be talking about every single person out there. There are people who work day and night; evidence is provided by the fact that America is still one of the most affluent countries in the world.

Without the Internet there would be no online classes or google searching. We like to blame the Internet for our distractions when, in fact, we are our own distractions. Some people like myself just naturally cannot concentrate on one subject. If we had no Internet, we would still be urged to pass notes to friends in class or go shopping with friends instead of finishing up homework. Living in a digital age therefore gives us more opportunities to prosper than to languish.

1 comment:

  1. Grace,

    OK, good as far as it goes. But can the benefits and the detriments of digital media usage merely be put on a scale and weighed so as to see whether its benefits outweigh its detriments? Shouldn't we rather actually evaluate the claims about what exactly is being jeopardized or lost? Carr, for example, is suggesting that nothing less than one of the major hallmarks of western culture is being threatened with extinction -- the depth of the individual subject. Is this the case? If not, why not? If so, is it irreversible? Can Internet use be supplemented in some way so as to preclude this possible eventuality?

    ReplyDelete